6.2.12

Una mirada al grotesco vital


Ideas extractadas de un texto de Marcela Albano, Tocorre, España, 13.4.2007

Las mismas fueron editadas sólo con el propósito de conferirles mayor claridad dentro del marco de mis personales estudios de investigación.



Tras haber vislumbrado cuadros de Picasso en 1928, Francis Bacon no era ya el mismo. Detrás de esas enormes figuras retorcidas en agrupaciones geométricas y pieles y carnes envueltas en caóticas y múltiples perspectivas.

En esa mirada se encontraba la semilla inesperada de su talento, el fuego creativo de su obra, y el aire apasionado heredero de antiguos sueños de expresionistas.

Bacon es uno de los artistas que abren la puerta al posmodernismo y lo hace bajo la bandera del Neofigurativismo, permitiéndonos a su vez dar una ojeada al grotesco vital.

Francis Bacon nace en Dublín, de padres ingleses, el 28 de octubre de 1909. Su padre es entrenador de caballos de carrera. Tras la Primera Guerra mundial, la familia se translada a menudo de lugar en lugar y la afección asmática impide que Bacon tenga una escolarización normal, recibiendo clases de profesores particulares.

Alrededor de 1925 es expulsado de la casa de sus padres para establecerse en Londres. Tras una breve estancia en Berlín, pasa dos años en Francia, cerca de Chantilly. Allí visita con frecuencia el Museo Condé, donde se conserva La matanza de los Inocentes, cuadro de Poussin (1630-1). La imagen de la madre gritando cuando le quitan a su hijo para asesinarlo le impresionó hasta el punto de convertirse en una imagen recurrente en sus primeras pinturas. A ello se le agrega otro grito famoso, el de la enfermera herida con los quevedos rotos que se desploma desde las escaleras de Odessa en El acorazado Potemkin, legendaria película de Sergei Eisenstein de 1925. Una exposición de obras de Picasso en París en la galería de Paul Rosenberg en 1927, lo lleva a iniciarse en la pintura.

Picasso le muestra que "hay todo un territorio que, en cierto modo, no ha sido todavía explorado, [un territorio] de formas orgánicas y relativas a la figura humana, pero que la distorsionan por completo".

Después de ver aquellas nuevas imágenes jamás volvería a ser el mismo.

A principios de los cincuenta, sus diferentes versiones del papa Inocencio X de Velázquez (a quien aparentemente admiraba) se conjugan con la brutalidad y los gritos ya mencionados evocando incluso el famoso Grito del expresionista noruego Munch.

De Rembradt toma el buey degollado pero lo traslada a un mundo helado y cruel, asfixiante y deformador, una cámara de torturas, un matadero, una carnicería.

Sus figuras desnudas presentan los rastros de un trauma interior termina por mutilar el cuerpo. Por doquier hay cuerpos desprovistos de toda belleza y reducidos hasta volverse simples masas sanguinolentas.

Alguien dijo que Bacon no pinta carne ni pescado sino una raza de boxeadores que él ha visto o soñado en algún sitio, algo tiene que ver con su vida nocturna, con su interior, del que nunca quiso salir. Presenta una superficie que en principio puede parecer picassiana. No obstante, mientras que Picasso pinta el día, Bacon apunta a la noche.

Ante lo retorcido de sus pinceladas tan idas y tensionantes en movimiento, el espectador busca escaparse. La Nueva Figuración a la Bacon lo expone es una forma de reflejar los propios temores y la agresión del mundo.

"Siempre que pinto", dice Bacon, "tengo la impresión de seguir la llamada de la antigüedad". Su conocimiento sobre los maestros antiguos le sirvieron para poder hacer frente a los temas de sus obras, temas que trata con violencia y agresión pero siempre con el respeto debido a las obras antiguas con las que jugaba para resignificarlas.

Tres estudios de figuras junto a una Crucifixión del año 1944 hace referencia al un tema alusivo -tres figuras, la idea de cuerpos mutilados-, y no explícita.

Las formas pulposas tienen cierto parecido con los monstruos de algunas pinturas surrealistas, movimiento con el que Francis Bacon tiene algunas conexiones que no llegan a encajar.

En el "estudio para retrato (Isabel Rawsthorne)", de 1964 existe una cierta discordancia entre la coordinación espacial del personaje y la silla en que se sienta, un factor común en muchos retratos del pintor.

La pintura de Bacon abrió heridas profundas en la belleza acabando con el sentido iconográfico del cuerpo para someterlo a una pesadilla. Supo retratar la soledad de seres masacrados por la vida y en sus óleos no tuvieron más regencias que el tibio y mal hecho lavado por el cual dejara a estas mismas figuras, profundamente deslavadas con esa apariencia desteñida de vida desdoblada y deformada.

Su pintura fue de la mano con su pensamiento. "Entre el nacimiento y la muerte siempre ha existido lo mismo, la violencia de la vida". En esta frase de Bacon convergen tanto su pensamiento como la materica forma de construir sus lienzos.

Bacon supo dentro de la Neofiguración entrar en ese camino sinuoso entre el informalismo y la abstracción y supo convertirse en le mejor exponente de esta vertiente.

Se concentró en ver a la figura humana como aislada de todo otro contacto humano y la rodeo de una soledad terrorífica y cuando no, encontrándose con otra, pero en una espiral de violencia.

No las doto de convenciones ni ataduras contextuales o históricas y se mantuvo a raya obedeciendo sólo a la actitud imperativa del trazo mórbido de su violencia compulsiva, variando a trechos entre la objetividad y la subjetividad.

La especialidad de los cuadros se acentúan no en el lugar en el que son pintados sino en la situación en la que son creados, y la temática para la que son evocados los personajes principales.

Existe un claro deseo de mostrarnos la relación que existe entre el fondo y la forma y es ese juego lúdico, frenético y dinámico que nos proporciona una visión del mismo movimiento vital que nos rodea.

Mientras que en ningún otro país esta tendencia tuvo claros esbozos de relevancia, las obras de Bacon alcanzan su sesgo de relevancia a pesar de que la Neofiguración o lo Grotesco Expresivo, jamás se convirtió en una tendencia muy concreta y que nació sin amparo obligada a terminar sus desenfrenos en la transitoriedad de los años.

Revelándose frente al estupor de la indefinición que nos prometía el informalismo, Bacon recupera un lenguaje directo, no ocasional que compromete al observador con la obra y lo hace parte de ella misma, empujándolo y retándolo mediante la claridad y vitalidad indiscutible de la violencia humana a la que ninguno de nosotros podría escapar.

4.2.12

Remarks

by Francis Bacon - Master of the Grotesque

Art as distraction. You see, all art has now become completely a game by which man distracts himself; and you may say it has always been like that, but now it's entirely a game. | Futility of being. I think that man now realizes that he is an accident, that he is a completely futile being, that he has to play out the game without reason. | Accident. I use very large brushes, and in the way I work I don't in fact know very often what the paint will do, and it does many things which are very much better than I could make it do. Is that an accident? [...] I think that accident, which you would call luck, is one of the most important aspects of my work. | Potential carcasses. Well, of course, we are meat, we are potential carcasses. If I go into a butcher’s shop I always think it’s surprising I wasn’t there instead of the animal. | No stories. In the complicated stage in which painting is now, the moment there are several figures - at any rate several figures on the same canvas - the story begins to be elaborated. And the moment the story is elaborated, the boredom sets in; the story talks louder than the paint. This is because we are actually in very primitive times once again, and we haven't been able to cancel out the story-telling between one image and another. | Tightrope. Painting a portrait is a tightrope walk between what is called figurative painting and abstraction. [...] It's an attempt to bring the figurative thing up onto the nervous system [...] violently and [...] poignantly. | Justification. You can't be more horrific than life itself. | Interwiew with David Sylvester, 1962

Abstract painting even at its very best, can be never more than lyrical, charming and decorative. It never finally unlocks, like great art can do, unlock the valves of feeling by the attempt to record the facts. What every artist needs today is a profound technical imagination. Technique by which he can reset the trap in which the image he wants to record can be trapped again. There are two things you can record. You can record a very factual thing, like a portrait of somebody, and you can also record your sensations about various things. Now you should know how you can record without illustrating. The great recording of facts today can only be made through accident. And the painter himself [...] has to work with the accident out of which he finally chooses the marks he wants to leave and can remake the image. The more unrelated the [accidental] mark is, of what is called an illustration of the fact, the more deeply can possibly [...] unlock all areas of feeling, which very great art has always done. Because it was not only recording a fact, but it has also unlocked all sorts of areas of sensation at the same time of recording, doing both, doing a double thing. | "Francis Bacon," pilot interview with Julian Jebb, London: BBC, recorded 1965, not broadcast

Transitoriness. You must never forget that every object has its passions. It has its implications. After all, life... we have this short moment of existence. To paint it’s a way... —we talk about Proust— of crystallizing time. And of crystallizing the moment of one’s existence and that’s all we have. Why one wants to do this? You may say it’s a mystery. We shan’t ever know whether we’ve done it. And perhaps it’s just a way of passing the time. "Stripped Down to What’s Real," interview with David Jones, London: BBC, broadcast 29 October 1971 on BBC2

Double-Edged: Bacon

Violence and Sensation. I used to think how marvellous these extraordinary carcasses are hanging in great butcher shops, hanging from the wall, how amazing their colour was, how beautiful they looked... What could I make to compete with what goes on every single day? If you read the newspapers, if you look at television, if you know what's going on in the world, what could I do that competes with the horror that 's going on? Except that I have tried to make images of it. I have tried to recreate it and make not the horror but I've tried to make images of realism. After all between birth and death it's always been the same thing. There's always been [...] the violence of life. I always think [I make] images of sensation. After all, what is life but sensation? [...] I believe in nothing: we are born and we die and that's it, there's nothing else. Voluptua is all we want, voluptuousness... isn't it a lovely word? Everything else is a falling away. "Francis Bacon," conversation with Melvyn Bragg, The South Bank Show, London, 1985

Additional reesources
Entrevista con David Sylvester, 1962. Arte como distracción, futilidad de ser, accidentes, carcasas potenciales, evitar la narrativa, entre lo figurativo y lo abstracto, horror y realidad.
Ades
Turano

2.2.12

Baconian Concerns

From: London, Tate Gallery, Francis Bacon, 9.2008-1.2009

100% Bacon

Introduction. Francis Bacon is internationally acknowledged as among the most powerful painters of the twentieth century. His vision of the world was unflinching and entirely individual, encompassing images of sensuality and brutality, both immediate and timeless. When he first emerged to public recognition, in the aftermath of the Second World War, his paintings were greeted with horror. Shock has since been joined by a wide appreciation of Bacon's ability to expose humanity's frailties and drives.
This major retrospective gathers many of his most remarkable paintings and is arranged broadly chronologically. Bacon's vision of the world has had a profound impact. It is born of a direct engagement that his paintings demand of each of us, so that, as he famously claimed, the 'paint comes across directly onto the nervous system'.
As an atheist, Bacon sought to express what it was to live in a world without God or afterlife. By setting sensual abandon and physical compulsion against hopelessness and irrationality, he showed the human as simply another animal. As a response to the challenge that photography posed for painting, he developed a unique realism which could convey more about the state of existence than photography's representation of the perceived world. In an era dominated by abstract art, he amassed and drew upon a vast array of visual imagery, including art of the past, photography and film. These artistic and philosophical concerns run like a spine through the present exhibition.

1. Animal. A philosophical attitude to human nature first emerges in Francis Bacon's works of the 1940s. They reflect his belief that, without God, humans are subject to the same natural urges of violence, lust and fear as any other animal. Bacon showed Figure in a Landscape and Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion in April 1945, and exhibited consistently thereafter. The bestial depiction of the human figure was combined with specific references to recent history and especially the devastating events of the Second World War.
Bacon often drew his inspiration from reproductions, acquiring a large collection of books, catalogues and magazines. He repeatedly studied key images in order to probe beneath the surface appearance captured in photographs.
Early concerns that would persist throughout his work include the male nude, which reveals the frailty of the human figure, and the scream or cry that expresses repressed and violent anxieties. These works are among the first in which he sought to balance psychological insights with the physical identity of flesh and paint.

2. Zone. In his paintings from the early 1950s, Bacon engaged in complex experiments with pictorial space. He started to depict specific details in the backgrounds of these works and created a nuanced interaction between subject and setting. Figures are boxed into cage-like structures, delineated 'space-frames' and hexagonal ground planes, confining them within a tense psychological zone. In 1952 he described this as 'opening up areas of feeling rather than merely an illustration of an object'.
Through his technique of 'shuttering' with vertical lines of paint that merge the foreground and background, Bacon held the figure and the setting together within the picture surface, with neither taking precedence in what he called 'an attempt to lift the image outside of its natural environment'.
A theme that emerged in the 1950s was the extended series of variants of Velázquez's Portrait of Pope Innocent X 1650, a work Bacon knew only from illustrations. He used this source to expose the insecurities of the powerful – represented most often in the scream of the caged figure. Through the open mouth he examined the tension between the interior of the body and the spaces of its location, which is explored more explicitly in the vulnerability of the ape-like nudes.

3. Apprehension. Implicit throughout Bacon's work of the mid 1950s is a sense of dread pervading everyday life. Not only a result of Cold War anxiety, this seems to have reflected a sense of menace at a personal level emanating from Bacon's chaotic affair with Peter Lacy (who was prone to drunken violence) and the wider pressures associated with the continuing illegality of homosexuality. The Man in Blue series captures this atmosphere, concentrating on a single anonymous male figure in a dark suit sitting at a table or bar counter on a deep blue-black ground. Within their simple painted frames, these awkwardly posed figures appear pathetically isolated.
Bacon's interest in situations that combine banality with acute apprehension was also evident in other works. From figures of anxious authority, his popes took on malevolent attributes and physical distortions that were directly echoed in the paintings of animals, whose actions are also both sinister and undignified. Some of these images derived from Bacon's close scrutiny of the sequential photographs of animals and humans taken by Eadweard Muybridge, which he called 'a dictionary' of the body in motion.

4. Crucifixion. Bacon made paintings related to the Crucifixion at pivotal moments in his career, which is why these key works are gathered together in this room. The paradox of an atheist choosing a subject laden with Christian significance was not lost on Bacon, but he claimed, 'as a non-believer, it was just an act of man's behaviour'.
Here the instincts of brutality and fear combine with a deep fascination with the ritual of sacrifice. Bacon had already made a very individual Crucifixion in 1933 before returning to the subject with his break-through triptych Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion in 1944. This is a key precursor to later themes and compositions, containing the bestial distortion of human figures within the triptych format. These monstrous creatures displace the traditional saints and Bacon later related them to the Eumenides – the vengeful Furies in Greek mythology.
In resuming the theme in the 1960s, especially in 1962 as the culmination of his first Tate exhibition, Bacon used references to Giovanni Cimabue's Crucifixion 1272–4, to introduce a more explicitly violent vision. Speaking after completing the third triptych in 1965 he simply stated: 'Well, of course, we are meat, we are potential carcasses.'

5. Crisis. Between 1956 and 1961, Bacon travelled widely. He spent time in places marginal to the art world, in Monaco, the south of France and Africa, and particularly with Peter Lacy in the expatriate community in Tangier.
In this rather unsettled context, he explored new methods of production, shifting to thicker paint, violently applied and so strong in colour as to indicate an engagement with the light of North Africa. This was most extreme in his series based on a self-portrait of Vincent van Gogh, The Painter on the Road to Tarascon 1888, which became an emblem of the modern predicament.
Despite initial acclaim, Bacon's van Gogh works were soon criticised for their 'reckless energy' and came to be viewed as an aberration. They can now be recognised as pivotal to Bacon's further development, however, and allow glimpses into his search for new ways of working. His innovations were perhaps in response to American Abstract Expressionism, of which he was publicly critical. Although he eventually returned to a more controlled approach to painting, the introduction of chance and the new vibrancy of colour at this moment would remain throughout his career.

6. Archive. The posthumous investigation of Bacon's studio confirmed the extent to which he used and manipulated photographic imagery. This practice was already known from montages recorded in the early 1950s by the critic Sam Hunter. Often united by a theme of violence, the material ranges between images of conflict, big game, athletes, film stills and works of art.
An important revelation that followed the artist's death was the discovery of lists of potential subjects and preparatory drawings, which Bacon had denied making. Throughout his life, he asserted the spontaneous nature of his work, but these materials reveal that chance was underpinned by planning.
Photography offered Bacon a dictionary of poses. Though he most frequently referred to Eadweard Muybridge's survey of human and animal locomotion, images of which he combined with the figures of Michelangelo, he remained alert to photographs of the body in a variety of positions.
A further extension of Bacon's preparatory practices can be seen in his commissioning of photographs of his circle of friends from the photographer John Deakin. The results – together with self-portraits, photo booth strips, and his own photographs – became important prompts in his shift from generic representations of the human body to portrayals of specific individuals.

7. Portrait. During the 1960s, the larger part of Bacon's work shifted focus to portraits and paintings of his close friends. These works centre on two broad concerns: the portrayal of the human condition and the struggle to reinvent portraiture. Bacon drew upon the lessons of van Gogh and Velázquez, but attempted to rework their projects for a post-photographic world.
His approach was to distort appearance in order to reach a deeper truth about his subjects. To this end, Bacon's models can be seen performing different roles. In the Lying Figures series, Henrietta Moraes is naked and exposed. This unprecedented raw sexuality reinforces Bacon's understanding of the human body simply as meat.
By contrast Isabel Rawsthorne, a fellow painter, always appears in control of how she is presented. With a mixture of contempt and affection, Bacon depicted George Dyer, his lover and most frequent model, as fragile and pathetic. This is especially evident in Dyer's first appearance in Bacon's work, Three Figures in a Room, in which he represents the absurdities, indignities and pathos of human existence. Everyday objects occasionally feature in these works, hollow props for lonely individuals which reinforce the sense of isolation that Bacon associated with the human condition.

8. Memorial. This room is dedicated to George Dyer who was Bacon's most important and constant companion and model from the autumn of 1963. He committed suicide on 24 October 1971, two days before the opening of Bacon's major exhibition at the Grand Palais in Paris.
Influenced by loss and guilt, the painter made a number of pictures in memorial to Dyer. From this period onwards the large-scale triptych was his established means for major statements, having the advantage of simultaneously isolating and juxtaposing the participating figures, as well as guarding against narrative qualities that he strove to avoid.
But while evading narratives, Bacon drew more than ever from literary imagery; the first of the sequence, Triptych In Memory of George Dyer 1971, refers to a specific section of T.S. Eliot's poem ‘The Waste Land'.
In addition to his own memory, for Triptych – August 1972 Bacon relied on photographs taken by John Deakin of Dyer in various poses on a chair. He confined his dense and energetic application of paint to the figures in these works. The dark openings consciously evoke the abyss of mortality that would become a recurring concern in Bacon's later works.

9. Epic. References to poetry and drama became a central element in Bacon's work from the second half of the 1960s. Alongside images of friends and single figures (often self-portraits), he produced a series of grand works that identified with great literature. Imbued with the inevitability and constant presence of death, the poetry of T.S. Eliot was a particular source of inspiration. The sentiments of the poet's character Sweeney could be said to echo the painter's perspective on life:
Birth, and copulation, and death.
That's all the facts when you come to
brass tacks:
Birth, and copulation, and death.
The works in this room refer to and derive from literature. Some make direct references in their titles, others depict, sometimes abstractly, a certain scene or atmosphere within the narratives themselves. Bacon repeatedly stated that none of his paintings were intended as narratives so, rather than illustrations, these works should perhaps be understood as evoking the experience of reading Eliot's poetry or Aeschylus's tragedies: their violence, threat or erotic charge. Thus, of the triptych created after reading Aeschylus, Bacon explained 'I tried to create images of the sensations that some of the episodes created inside me'.

10. Late. When Bacon turned seventy in 1979, more than a decade of work lay ahead of him. Neither his legendarily hedonistic lifestyle nor his work pattern seemed to age him, but he was continually facing up to mortality through the deaths of those around him.
This unswerving confrontation, however mitigated by youthful companions such as John Edwards, became the great theme of his late style. Constantly stimulated by new source material – from photographs to poetry – he was able to adapt them to his abiding concerns with the vulnerability of flesh.
Exploring new techniques he also extended his fascination with how appropriate oil paint is for rendering the human body's sensuality and sensitivity. A certain despairing energy may also be felt in the forceful throwing of paint that dominates some of these final works: the controlled chance as a defiant gesture.
Ultimately, and appropriately, Bacon's last Triptych of 1991 returns to the key image of sexual struggle that had frequently recurred in his work. He faced death with a defiant concentration on the exquisiteness of the lived moment.

1.2.12

Lo Grotesco en las pinturas de Bacon


Luis Mariano Akerman
Lo Grotesco en las pinturas de Francis Bacon
1999

Francis Bacon, Retrato de George Dyer en un espejo, 1968. Óleo sobre lienzo, 198 x 147.5 cm. Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid. "Tal vez algún día me las arregle para capturar un instante de vida en toda su violencia y toda su belleza", Bacon, citado por Paloma Alarcó al referirse a esta obra en 2001.

Las pinturas de Bacon son misteriosas y sugestivas. Son ambiguas y constituyen símbolos con múltiples significados, los que son comunicados gracias a la hábil manipulación que el artista hace de lo Grotesco. Como configuraciones de lo ambiguo, las pinturas instintivas de Bacon generan tanto curiosidad como perplejidad, incluso atracción y repulsión al mismo tiempo. En efecto, un estudiado balance entre miedo y deseo, vulnerabilidad y crueldad, sufrimiento y apatía es propio de las pinturas de Bacon.

Tensión e intensidad, la combinación de elementos incompatibles entre sí y numerosas sugestiones de lo monstruoso e inhumano abundan en la imaginería del artista. Bacon usa lo Grotesco como medio de expresión. Ello le permite transmitir de un modo ambiguo no sólo su admiración por el poder y la violencia, sino además sus heridas más íntimas. Lo Grotesco actúa en su caso como un conveniente instrumento de purga y trascendencia.

Si bien extravagantes, las pinturas instintivas de Bacon están lejos de ser adornos accesorios (grutescas, caprichos en estilo auricular, grotescos cartilaginosos).[1] Se trata de informes personales inalienables que conllevan una verdad privada: las sensaciones contradictorias y el sentir ambivalente del pintor, que no son ni meramente ornamentales ni completamente evasivos.

Paradójico hasta la médula, el arte grotesco de Bacon es profundo pero también superficial. Si lo Grotesco a menudo involucra lo ridículo, la imaginería de Bacon es entonces inclusiva hasta el punto de mezclar lo absurdo con la lógica. Ya que es el suyo un arte de simultánea lucidez y sinrazón.

A través de su imaginería instintiva, Bacon camina a voluntad por el borde de un precipicio emocional, dejando huellas de su obsesión con el sexo y la muerte, su apatía respecto a la vulnerabilidad y el sufrimiento humano, y su irresistible fascinación con la fuerza física viril y su agresividad.

Con su inmediatez y vaguedad, la grotesca obra de Bacon revela y al mismo tiempo oculta las intenciones últimas del artista. Y lo hace de un modo tan turbio que la mismísima noción de identidad se vuelve problemática su pintura instintiva.

Al representar lo ambiguamente combinado y lo equívocamente sugestivo, Bacon desorienta al espectador, quien a su vez no puede establecer ningún significado preciso en sus imágenes de metamorfosis en estado avanzado. Varias lecturas son así posibles y todas ellas parecen ser válidas. Considerando que el instinto implica la abolición de la moral, al contemplar las imágenes de Bacon debemos llegar a nuestras propias conclusiones morales (irrelevantes para el pintor y su calculado desinterés al respecto). En ese mismo momento todo se desmorona bajo nuestros pies, ya que en el grotesco reino de Bacon sólo nos es segura la inseguridad.

Hoy queda claro que las pinturas instintivas no son el resultado de ningún accidente pictórico o de la pura casualidad (ambos indicados por el pintor en reiteradas oportunidades). En efecto, las pinturas instintivas no son otra cosa que composiciones diseñadas que conciernen a la vida privada de su autor. Sean ya ilustrativas o no, las pinturas instintivas de Bacon de hecho funcionan como efectivas trampas visuales, sugiriendo con persistencia una realidad monstruosa, a la que propongo denominar realidad de doble filo.

En este contexto, comprendemos la manipulación que Bacon hace de lo Grotesco y su decisiva intervención en transformarlo en agente útil para su expresión personal. El arte instintivo de Bacon es por ello profundo, pero también problemático—una Nueva Gran Manera de Pintar que entremezcla lo poderosamente desafiante, lo extraordinariamente perturbador, lo sugestivamente monstruoso, lo cínicamente alusivo, lo teatralmente manipulador, y lo enigmáticamente privado.

Como especie de confusión por excelencia, lo Grotesco suspende la creencia para promover la búsqueda de nuevos significados. Empujándonos a considerar posibilidades alternativas, lo Grotesco paraliza el lenguaje y pone en jaque a las categorías. El arte grotesco amplía nuestro modo de sentir y de pensar.[2]

Todo esto es particularmente cierto en el caso de Bacon, cuyo arte grotesco engendra múltiples ideas y asociaciones, garantizándonos así un rol activo como espectadores e intérpretes. Este posiblemente sea el significado último o razón de ser de la libertad pictórica del artista, a la cual él ha llegado a través de su notable manipulación de lo Grotesco.

El elemento personal y ambiguo que acecha desde el arte de Bacon tiene una enorme capacidad para abrir las válvulas del sentir. Es a este elemento, expresivo y metamórfico, típico del arte sugestivo de Bacon al que yo encuentro extraordinariamente fecundo: el instinto pictórico es un elemento provocativo y grotesco que—de un modo coherente—crea un puente entre la verdad del pintor y nuestra libertad.

Francis Bacon, Autorretrato, 1972
Óleo sobre lienzo, 35.5 x 30.5 cm
Colección Gilbert de Bottom, Suiza

Notas
1. Grutescas, grutescos o grotescos. Adornos caprichosos que presentan figuras o partes humanas combinadas con otras animales y vegetales en un todo complejo e insólito. Conocidos como grotteschi, el origen de tales ornamentos irracionales se halla en los motivos de la Domus Aurea de Nerón (en Roma), a la que en tiempos del Renacimiento se accedía a través de túneles artificiales o grotto. Recordando la suavidad, formas y curvas de la oreja humana, el estilo auricular fue desarrollado por plateros holandeses a principios del siglo XVII; en Alemania, dicho estilo llegó a su expresión extrema con el Knorpelwerk (trabajo de cartílago), caracterizado por sus extraños mascarones a los que se conoce como "grotescos cartilaginosos." Una interesante serie de grabados ornamentales que resultan ser consonantes con lo expresado ha sido oportunamente compilada por Joaquin Llorda para la Universidad de Navarra; tales estampas han sido tomadas de Désiré Guilmard, Les maîtres ornemanistes: dessinateurs, peintres, architectes, sculpteurs et graveurs: écoles française, italienne, allemande et des Pays-Bas (flamande & hollandaise), París: E. Plon, 1880-1.
2. Geoffrey Galt Harpham, On the Grotesque: Strategies of Contradiction in Art and Literature, Princeton, Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1982

Para otros recursos ligados con este tema, véase SER Y NO SER

Comparación por Mariano Akerman, 2008. Motivo del panel central de Tres estudios para figuras al pie de una crucifixión (Francis Bacon, 1944) y su referente visual en Maladies de la bouche (Ludwig Grünwald, 1903). Investigación original.

© Mariano Akerman. Todos los Derechos Reservados. El presente artículo no ha de ser reproducido ni republicado sin el previo consentimiento por escrito de su autor. El texto aquí publicado es también conocido como Lo Grotesco en las pinturas instintivas de Francis Bacon, julio de 1999; la presente versión, formulada en febrero de 2009, es presentada con motivo del centenario del natalicio del pintor británico.

9.8.11

Double Silence | Silencio Doble


There are some qualities —some incorporate things,
That have a double life, which thus is made
A type of that twin entity which springs
From matter and light, evinced in solid and shade.
There is a two-fold Silence —sea and shore
—Body and soul. One dwells in lonely places,
Newly with grass o'ergrown; some solemn graces,
Some human memories and tearful lore,
Render him terrorless: his name's "No More."
He is the corporate Silence: dread him not!
No power hath he of evil in himself;
But should some urgent fate (untimely lot!)
Bring thee to meet his shadow (nameless elf,
That haunteth the lone regions where hath trod
No foot of man,) commend thyself to God!

Edgar Allan Poe, "Silence," sonnet, 1839



Francis Bacon
Two Figures | Dos Figuras
1961



Hay algunas cualidades, algunas cosas incorpóreas,
Que tienen doble vida, que muestran
Una especie de doble entidad que emana,
De materia y luz; sólido y sombra.
Hay un Silencio doble— mar y costa—
—Cuerpo y alma. Habita en lugares desolados,
Reciente la hierba sobre ellos; algunas gracias solemnes,
Ciertos recuerdos humanos y llorosa erudición,
Quítale el terror: su nombre es "No Más”
Él es el corporativo Silencio: ¡no le temas!
No tiene el poder del mal en sí
Pero de llevarte alguna veloz suerte (¡inoportuno lote!)
Al presentarte su sombra (anónimo duende,
Que se hizo sentir en solitarias regiones donde no anduvo
Hombre ninguno), ¡encomiéndate a Dios!

Edgar Allan Poe, "Silencio," poema, 1839
Traducción libre de Mariano Akerman

5.8.11

Zissou on Bacon


"As I flicked through the big book of Bacon’s works I felt a spark of something I had never felt before – a style I had never seen, a sense of mystery, of subversion, even menace – and yet the forms and flow of the lines felt so elegant and natural to me. It felt as if Bacon discovered a way to visually expose, even for just a fleeting moment, the inner soul of the sitter, it felt honest.
His works, particularly in the middle years of his career, have always managed to draw me in. I am regularly seeing them in different ways. The same painting can often drum up a completely different emotion each time I view it. I spot another technique or another form. They have made me think about art and life probably more than any other works that I have encountered." - Zissou

These words reflect with admirable precision what Francis Bacon's art keeps on producing in myself too. Thank you Zissou for such significant words. - M.A.

By the way, Zissou's work is fascinating.

4.8.11

Notas sobre Francis Bacon en Español


El poder de la palabra es un sitio serio dedicado a la cultura -literatura, arte, música, arquitectura, cine- y por ello altamente apreciado. Acerca de Francis Bacon: "Pintor británico de origen irlandés, cuyo personalísimo estilo expresionista, basado en un simbolismo de terror y rabia, le ha convertido en uno de los artistas más originales del siglo XX. Nació en Dublín, de padres ingleses, el 28 de octubre de 1909 y llegó a Londres a finales de la década de 1920. Entre 1927-1928 pasó algún tiempo en París y Berlín, donde hizo trabajos de decoración y comenzó a realizar dibujos y acuarelas, tras la impresión que le produjo una exposición de Pablo Picasso. En 1929 volvió a Londres y se inició como autodidacto en la pintura al óleo. En 1944 ante el escaso éxito de sus obras destruyó casi todas las pinturas que había hecho hasta entonces. El Tríptico Tres estudios de figuras junto a una crucifixión (1944) marcó el reinicio de su carrera sobre unas bases totalmente nuevas. En 1948 el Museo de Arte Moderno (MOMA) de Nueva York compró una obra suya y en 1949, año de su primera pintura inspirada en el cuadro de Velázquez, Inocencio X, comenzaron una serie de exposiciones individuales. Una buena parte de su obra está constituida por autorretratos y retratos de amigos suyos como el Retrato de George Dyer en un espejo (1968, Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid). Fiel a la idea de que el arte más grande te devuelve siempre a la vulnerabilidad de la situación humana, su obra es una constante reflexión sobre la fragilidad del ser. En cuadros como Cabeza rodeada de carne de vaca (Estudio después de Velázquez) (1954, Art Institute of Chicago) y en una serie pintada en 1952 sobre perros que gruñen, Bacon intentó impactar al espectador al hacerle tomar conciencia de la crueldad y violencia" (ME).

Francis Bacon, Tres estudios para una crucifixión, 1962
Panel central, óleo sobre lienzo, 198.1 x 144.8 cm
Museo Guggenheim, Nueva York
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...